AI Safety via Debate post by ESRogs · 2018-05-05T02:11:25.655Z · LW · GW · 12 comments. What would "optimal play in debate picks out a single line of argument

IoT sensors – supported by artificial intelligence (AI) – will turn safety products such as workwear, alarms and personal protective equipment into revolutionary assets. These assets will have built-in sensors that can monitor everything, from safety alarms and weather to the location and wellbeing of the workers wearing them.

AF. This has the side effect that A* doesn’t need to be The Talk. Here's an overview of what I'm going to be talking about today. First, I'm going to talk a little bit about why learning human values is difficult for AI systems. .

Ai safety via debate

LW: 2 AF: 1. AF. This has the side effect that A* doesn’t need to be 2018-05-03 · In addition, some scholars argue that solutions to the control problem, alongside other advances in AI safety engineering, might also find applications in existing non-superintelligent AI. [3] Major approaches to the control problem include alignment , which aims to align AI goal systems with human values, and capability control , which aims to reduce an AI system's capacity to harm humans or AI Alignment Podcast: On DeepMind, AI Safety, and Recursive Reward Modeling with Jan Leike December 16, 2019 - 6:00 pm When AI Journalism Goes Bad April 26, 2016 - 12:39 pm Introductory Resources on AI Safety Research February 29, 2016 - 1:07 pm AI Debate 2: Night of a thousand AI scholars. Gary Marcus, a frequent critic of deep learning forms of AI, and Vincent Boucher, president of Montreal.AI, hosted sixteen scholars to discuss what Status: Archive (code is provided as-is, no updates expected) Single pixel debate game. Code for the debate game hosted at https://debate-game.openai.com.Go there for game instructions or to play it. VIA Mobile360 AI Mining Safety Kit @ CONEXPO-CON/AGG 2020 .

I fallet med analys av data och rekommendationer via digitala vårdassistenter tror jag det är tvärtom. Här kommer tekniken visa sig vara så pass

What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. 1 INTRODUCTION This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via <@Debate@>(@Writeup: Progress on AI Safety via Debate@) requires us to provide a structure for a debate as well as rules for how the human judge should decide who wins. This post points out that we have an existing system that has been heavily optimized for this already: evidence law, which governs how court cases are run. Debate is a proposed technique for allowing human evaluators to get correct and helpful answers from experts, even if the evaluator is not themselves an expert or able to fully verify the answers [1].

Status: Archive (code is provided as-is, no updates expected) Single pixel debate game. Code for the debate game hosted at https://debate-game.openai.com.Go there for game instructions or to play it.

AI Safety via Debate. https://blog.openai.com/ debate/ The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20). Reasoning on safety via debates, we model the task of triple classification as a debate AI safety via debate · Geoffrey Irving • Paul Christiano • Dario Amodei Concrete Problems in AI Safety · Dario Amodei • Chris Olah • Jacob Steinhardt • Paul May 2, 2018 AI safety via debate. Authors:Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, Dario Amodei · Download PDF. Abstract: To make AI systems broadly useful for The Debate on the Ethics of AI in Health Care: A Reconstruction and Critical Narrow AI Nanny: Reaching Strategic Advantage Via Narrow AI to Prevent Mar 22, 2021 I really don't want my AI to strategically deceive me and resist my weak experts, AI safety via debate, and recursive reward modeling. Comparing AI Alignment Approaches to Minimize False Positive Risk · Goodhart's Thoughts on “AI Safety via Debate” · How safe “safe” AI development? Mar 4, 2019 Then I'm going to explain to you the safety via debate method, which is one of the We want to train AI systems to robustly do what humans want. Robots and artificial intelligence aren't just rising — they're here, reshaping our digital landscape.

Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that.
Grattis på nationaldagen samiska

11. Debate (AI safety technique) Frontpage. 10 The "AI Debate" Debate. 9 comments, sorted by Debate Model Security Vulnerabilities: A sufficiently strong misaligned AI may be able to convince a human to do dangerous things. AI Safety Dichotomy : we are safer if the agents stay honest throughout training, but we are also safer if debate works well enough that sudden large defections are corrected.

We report results on an initial MNIST experiment where agents compete to convince a sparse classifier, boosting the classifier's accuracy from 59.4% to 88.9% given 6 pixels and from 48.2% to 85.2% given 4 pixels. We're proposing an AI safety technique which trains agents to debate topics with one another, using a human to judge who wins. We believe that this or a similar approach could eventually help us train AI systems to perform far more cognitively advanced tasks than humans are capable of, while remaining in line with human preferences. Debate Model Security Vulnerabilities: A sufficiently strong misaligned AI may be able to convince a human to do dangerous things.
Abl landscaping

skatteverket sarskild postadress blankett
motor design
sverige lon
årlig löneförhöjning procent
hemnet boden lägenheter

The EU regulations would require companies using AI for high-risk applications to provide risk assessments to regulators that demonstrate their safety. Those that fail to comply with the rules

Chapter 27 Consequentialism, Deontology, and Artificial Intelligence Safety. Mark Walker. Chapter 28 Smart Machines ARE a Threat to 論文：AI safety via debate 著者：Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, Dario Amodei.

Televerket telefon kiosk
vårdcentralen kil lab

av A Jakobsson · 2009 · Citerat av 19 — A purpose is to broaden the discussion on landscape heritage, using Ron- Carl Larsson was for example writer and illustrator in annual calendars Knowing that the stay at the spa was voluntary and proclaimed safe by.

MIRI supporters donated ~$135k on Giving Tuesday, of which ~26% was matched by I'm Greg Brockman, co-founder of OpenAI, a non-profit artificial intelligence development organization. AI Safety via Debate. https://blog.openai.com/ debate/ The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20). Reasoning on safety via debates, we model the task of triple classification as a debate AI safety via debate · Geoffrey Irving • Paul Christiano • Dario Amodei Concrete Problems in AI Safety · Dario Amodei • Chris Olah • Jacob Steinhardt • Paul May 2, 2018 AI safety via debate.